加载中...
推荐位 推荐位

这条审查意见该如何答复和修改?

发布时间:2017.02.23 福建省查看:1412 评论:2

新手请教老师们,审查员来意见了,这条该如何答复?

审查员的意见如下:
5.   You description potentially casts doubt on the scope of your claims by indicating that everything from line 7 of page 2 to line 5 on page 5, is essential to your invention, except for the width of the second passage as described on line 8 of page 4 (which is qualified by 'advantageously'). In order to support the scope of your claims, your description should contain a statement of invention which requires only those features required by claim 1. Descriptions of preferred embodiments, which contain more than just the essential features, should be introduced in a way that makes it clear that they are non-limiting.



求助
a. 难道是“advantageously”惹的?是否应该改成“specifically”? 其他段落都是以“specifically”开头的,唯独这段是用“advantageously”开头的。
b. 如何答复结尾那句“should be introduced in a way that makes it clear that they are non-limiting.”



标签: 如何 essential second everything except


分享

收藏

点赞

举报

评论列表

  • 第1楼
    大家讨论一下

    2017/02/23 18:13 [来自北京市]

    0 举报
  • 第2楼
    你的statement部分,就是说明书的最后那部分,A条上面是否有包括advantageously后面的内容?如果有,修改成和你的权利要求结构一致应该就行。

    2017/02/23 18:22 [来自中国香港]

    0 举报

快速回复